AI at work · fictional workplace scenes
The polished answer wins
A polished interview answer is not a demonstration of the job. Otto highlights a fictional candidate’s confident response about handling customer escalations. The panel calls it strong evidence. Ollie checks the notes and finds no example of what the candidate actually did, what changed, or who observed the result.
Why it looked good
The answer is fluent and easy to summarize. Its delivery fills the space where a concrete example should be.
Q1 · What is this really for?
What customer problem must this role solve, and what example shows the candidate doing that work?
Q2 · Who decides, and did they?
Who judges this criterion, and have they agreed what evidence would support the rating?
The next move
Ollie marks the rating as needing evidence and asks Casey to agree on a consistent follow-up for candidates with the same evidence gap.
Try another scene
This is a standalone fictional workplace scenario, not a scene from a published episode.
← Browse all AI-at-work traps · Play a standalone workplace scene
Site last updated: