ask two questions

← AI-at-work trap bank

Q, the yellow two-question guide, waving hello.

AI at work · fictional workplace scenes

A follow-up question becomes a rejection

A request for more evidence can turn into a rejection when a summary drops its condition. In this fictional debrief, Casey asks whether the candidate can explain a difficult handoff. Otto records the unresolved question as a negative verdict. Ollie notices the draft rejection cites a concern that nobody has actually assessed.

Why it looked good

A tidy yes-or-no summary hides the difference between an unanswered question and an observed weakness.

Q1 · What is this really for?

What evidence would answer the handoff question, and what decision can the current notes support?

Q2 · Who decides, and did they?

Who decides whether to gather more evidence or decline, and have they made that choice?

The next move

Ollie restores the concern as an open question and asks Casey to choose a follow-up or an explicit decision using the available evidence.

Try another scene

This is a standalone fictional workplace scenario, not a scene from a published episode.

Play Spot the Trap →

Print this trap with its matching two-question back (A4 or US Letter) →

← Browse all AI-at-work traps · Play a standalone workplace scene

About this practice

Site last updated: